# SRIP - countermeasures

**URL:** <https://forum.irap.org/t/srip-countermeasures/1078>\
**Category:** ViDA\
**Created:** [January 28, 2025, 9:25pm UTC](https://forum.irap.org/t/srip-countermeasures/1078 "2025-01-28T21:25:28Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lulrege](https://forum.irap.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/eb8c5e/32.png) [@lulrege](https://forum.irap.org/u/lulrege)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2025, 9:25pm UTC](https://forum.irap.org/t/srip-countermeasures/1078/1 "2025-01-28T21:25:28Z")

</div>

Hello,

During the SRIP process, I noticed that VIDA includes countermeasures that do not align with the specified scenario. For example, when all countermeasures are turned on and the scenario is set to BCR \>= 1, the results still include some countermeasures with a BCR less than 1. I had expected the system to screen out and display only those that meet the scenario criteria on the result.

Could you please provide any insights into this issue (beyond simply hiding the countermeasures)? Your clarification would be greatly appreciated.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![shanna.lucchesi](https://forum.irap.org/user_avatar/forum.irap.org/shanna.lucchesi/32/386_2.png) [@shanna.lucchesi](https://forum.irap.org/u/shanna.lucchesi)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2025, 7:37am UTC](https://forum.irap.org/t/srip-countermeasures/1078/2 "2025-01-31T07:37:59Z")

</div>

Hi. Can you share a screenshot of your results or the project direction on ViDA, please?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lulrege](https://forum.irap.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/eb8c5e/32.png) [@lulrege](https://forum.irap.org/u/lulrege)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2025, 10:08pm UTC](https://forum.irap.org/t/srip-countermeasures/1078/3 "2025-01-31T22:08:11Z")

</div>

Here is the screen shot. I used BCR \>=1, but I still have countermeasures less than 1

 ![Screenshot 2025-02-01 at 1.07.07 AM](https://forum.irap.org/uploads/default/original/1X/86e2c31c663f04f630e79862171b8f950cd23100.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![shanna.lucchesi](https://forum.irap.org/user_avatar/forum.irap.org/shanna.lucchesi/32/386_2.png) [@shanna.lucchesi](https://forum.irap.org/u/shanna.lucchesi)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2025, 9:20am UTC](https://forum.irap.org/t/srip-countermeasures/1078/4 "2025-02-03T09:20:26Z")

</div>

Hi! The multiple countermeasure calculation is done after the initial BCR screening for individual countermeasures. For this reason, sometimes countermeasures end having a lower BCR. You can find more about the calculations in the Multiple Countermeasure Factsheet. → [Login - Single Sign On](https://resources.irap.org/Methodology/iRAP%20model%20factsheet%2012%20-%20Multiple%20countermeasures.pdf?_gl=1*1ukd4mg*_ga*NDkxNjIyNDg1LjE3MDI4ODA3ODQ.*_ga_HK6PSM29PR*MTczODU3MzM1OS4yODYuMS4xNzM4NTczNDg1LjAuMC4w)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lulrege](https://forum.irap.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/eb8c5e/32.png) [@lulrege](https://forum.irap.org/u/lulrege)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2025, 5:34pm UTC](https://forum.irap.org/t/srip-countermeasures/1078/5 "2025-03-27T17:34:48Z")

</div>

Thanks Shanna. So what should be done incase of this? Should we eliminate the countermeasures less than 1, or should we keep it as is?
